The World Is Flat

The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century  

Original 1st edition cover
Author(s) Thomas Friedman
Country United States
Language English
Subject(s) Globalization
Publisher Farrar, Straus and Giroux
Publication date April 5, 2005
Media type Print (Hardcover and Paperback) and audio-CD
Pages 488
ISBN 0-374-29288-4
OCLC Number 57202171
Dewey Decimal 330.90511 22
LC Classification HM846 .F74 2005

The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century is an international bestselling book by Thomas Friedman that analyzes globalization, primarily in the early 21st century. The title is a metaphor for viewing the world as a level playing field in terms of commerce, where all competitors have an equal opportunity. As the first edition cover illustration indicates, the title also alludes to the perceptual shift required for countries, companies and individuals to remain competitive in a global market where historical and geographical divisions are becoming increasingly irrelevant.

The book was first released in 2005, was later released as an "updated and expanded" edition in 2006, and yet again released with additional updates in 2007 as "further updated and expanded: Release 3.0." The title was derived from a statement by Nandan Nilekani, the former CEO of Infosys. The World is Flat won the inaugural Financial Times and Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year Award in 2005.

Contents

Summary

In the book, The World is Flat, Friedman recounts a journey to Bangalore, India, when he realized globalization has changed core economic concepts.[1] In his opinion, this flattening is a product of a convergence of personal computer with fiber-optic micro cable with the rise of work flow software. He termed this period as Globalization 3.0, differentiating this period from the previous Globalization 1.0 (in which countries and governments were the main protagonists) and the Globalization 2.0 (in which multinational companies led the way in driving global integration).

Friedman recounts many examples of companies based in India and China that, by providing labor from typists and call center operators to accountants and computer programmers, have become integral parts of complex global supply chains for companies such as Dell, AOL, and Microsoft. Friedman's Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention is discussed in the book's penultimate chapter.

Friedman repeatedly uses lists as an organizational device to communicate key concepts, usually numbered, and often with a provocative label. Two example lists are the ten forces that flattened the world, and three points of convergence.

Ten flatteners

Friedman defines ten "flatteners" that he sees as leveling the global playing field:

Triple convergence

In addition to the ten flatteners, Friedman offers "the triple convergence", three additional components that acted on the flatteners to create a new, flatter global playing field.

  1. Up until the year 2000, the ten flatteners were semi-independent from one another. An example of independence is the inability of one machine to perform multiple functions. When work-flow software and hardware converged, multiple functions such as e-mail, fax, printing, copying and communicating were able to be done from one machine. Around the year 2000, all the flatteners converged with one another. This convergence could be compared to complementary goods, in that each flattener enhanced the other flatteners; the more one flattener developed, the more leveled the global playing field became.
  2. After the emergence of the ten flatteners, a new business model was required to succeed. While the flatteners alone were significant, they would not enhance productivity without people being able to use them together. Instead of collaborating vertically (the top-down method of collaboration, where innovation comes from the top), businesses needed to begin collaborating horizontally. Horizontalization means companies and people collaborate with other departments or companies to add value, creation or innovation. Friedman's Convergence II occurs when horizontalization and the ten flatteners begin to reinforce each other and people understand the capability of the technologies available.
  3. After the fall of the Berlin Wall, countries that had followed the Soviet economic model – including India, China, Russia, and the nations of Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Central Asia – began to open up their economies to the world. When these new players converged with the rest of the globalized marketplace, they added new brain power to the whole playing field and enhanced horizontal collaboration across the globe. In turn, Convergence III is the most important force shaping politics and economics in the early 21st century.

Proposed remedies

Thomas Friedman believes that to fight the quiet crisis of a flattening world, the United States work force should keep updating its work skills. Making the work force more adaptable, Friedman argues, will keep it more employable. He also suggests that the government make it easier to switch jobs by making retirement benefits and health insurance less dependent on one's employer and by providing insurance that would partly cover a possible drop in income when changing jobs. Friedman also believes there should be more inspiration for youth to be scientists, engineers, and mathematicians due to a decrease in the percentage of these professionals being American.

Reception

In a 2007 Foreign Policy magazine article, Harvard Business School Professor Pankaj Ghemawat argued that 90% of the world's phone calls, Web traffic, and investments are local, suggesting that Friedman has grossly exaggerated the significance of the trends he describes: "Despite talk of a new, wired world where information, ideas, money, and people can move around the planet faster than ever before, just a fraction of what we consider globalization actually exists."[2][3]

The book is perceived to be written from an American perspective. Friedman's work history has been mostly with The New York Times and this may have influenced the way in which the book was written – some would have preferred a book written in a more "inclusive voice".[4]

Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz has also been critical of Friedman's book. In Making Globalization Work, Stiglitz writes:

Friedman is right that there have been dramatic changes in the global economy, in the global landscape; in some directions, the world is much flatter than it has ever been, with those in various parts of the world being more connected than they have ever been, but the world is not flat […] Not only is the world not flat: in many ways it has been getting less flat.

Richard Florida expresses similar views in his 2005 Atlantic article "The World is Spiky".[5]

Matt Taibbi of the New York Press wrote a scathing review, saying that "On an ideological level, Friedman's new book is the worst, most boring kind of middlebrow horseshit. If its literary peculiarities could somehow be removed from the equation, The World Is Flat would appear as no more than an unusually long pamphlet replete with the kind of plug-filled, free-trader leg-humping that passes for thought in this country", adding: "Things are true because you say they are. The only thing that matters is how sure you sound when you say it. And that's basically what he's doing here. The internet is speeding up business communications, and global labor markets are more fluid than ever. Therefore, the moon is made of cheese. That is the rhetorical gist of The World Is Flat. It's brilliant." Taibbi also takes issue with the title, noting that "The significance of Columbus's discovery was that on a round earth, humanity is more interconnected than on a flat one. On a round earth, the two most distant points are closer together than they are on a flat earth. But Friedman is going to spend the next 470 pages turning the "flat world" into a metaphor for global interconnectedness. Furthermore, he is specifically going to use the word round to describe the old, geographically isolated, unconnected world." He concludes, "Four hundred and 73 pages of this, folks. Is there no God?"[1].

Editions

See also

References

  1. ^ Warren Bass (April 3, 2005). "The Great Leveling". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17314-2005Mar31.html. Retrieved 2007-09-06. 
  2. ^ Pankaj Ghemawat (March/April 2007). "Why the World Isn't Flat" Foreignpolicy.com. (Subscription). Accessed 2008-04-03.
  3. ^ Pankaj Ghemawat (October 2007). Why the world isn't flat. Growth Strategies. Accessed 2008-06-04.
  4. ^ Peter Begley (2006). "The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century". Accessed 2006-11-06.
  5. ^ Richard Florida (October 2005). "The world is spiky". Atlantic Monthly. Accessed 2009-05-09.
  6. ^ Justin Fox (October 17, 2005). "A Painter Is Flat-Out Flimflammed". Fortune Magazine. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/10/17/8358061/index.htm. Retrieved 2007-10-21. 

External links

Reviews